Care Aesthetics by professor of applied theatre James Thompson, he writes, “[c]are aesthetics highlights [a] simultaneity — where art making and care taking happen at one and the same time, and where the social outcome and the aesthetic experience cannot be untangled.”4 Care in Paloma’s discourse takes on elevated importance with an attendant task of “world-softening,” achieved literally and figuratively through a conceptual approach to soft sculpture. For the artist, world softening is integral in creating a gentler place that foregrounds pleasure in interactions with artistic and mundane objects. In this alchemy of concepts, that feeling of bittersweetness rises again, encompassing the meaningful swirl of affect that accompanies the task of world-dismantling and building that Paloma leaves her audience with — itself a by-product as we create a new and, for Paloma, decidedly softer reality.
Paloma and Milad expertly utilize their respective media to arrive at truths only conveyable through a layering of the visual and linguistic. In doing so, they ask what parts comprise our narratives around self-hood and heritage. How can we dismantle the false construct of objective linearity and embrace a more distributed, multiply-situated conception of our stories? If a dismantling is possible, so too is the building of a softer and more accurate world for ourselves and all whose experiences do not hew to an orderly path.
— Kat Zagaria Buckley, Director of Art Exhibitions and Outreach
1 Donna Haraway, “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective,” Feminist Studies 14, no. 3 (1988): 575–99, https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066. For an important note on the comprehension of subaltern situated knowledges by privileged individuals, see Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture., edited by Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, 24–28. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1988.
2 Yuriko Saito, Everyday Aesthetics, 1st edition (Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 9. While Saito defines the aesthetic as a reaction to any sensorial stimulation, I take a narrower view: aesthetics does not encompass the totality of human experience but rather our reactions as they pertain to affect and decision-making in response to stimuli, particularly (but not limited to) stimuli that is expressive. Saito later expounds in a way that could be read as agreeing with this reading, pp. 48–51, yet her original definition stands as she says the idea of experiential aesthetics limits the conception of everyday aesthetics and the aesthetic in general— that is where we disagree. Stimuli expressive in this conception are not limited to artistic, performative, and literary works; they may encompass anything, for example, athletics: Simone Biles’ double layout with a half twist imprints her signature creative and skilled expression onto the Floor Routine category; to view Biles’s performance, which applies innovation in a regimented field, and feel something upon observing it, is an aesthetic experience.
3 Saito, 40.
4 James Thompson, Care Aesthetics: For Artful Care and Careful Art (Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge, 2023), 84.